SANDEEP MISHRA AND 23 ORS. v. U.P. JAL NIGAM THRU M.D. RANA PRATAP MARG LKO. and OTHERS
WRIA/16264/2016 · 2025-10-28
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202548 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202548 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 16264 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 28, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Niwas Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., I.P. Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sandeep Mishra And 23 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam Thru M.D. Rana Pratap Marg Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench