HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6283 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Chief Revenue Officer, Sultanpur to decide the Recall Application dated 11.09.2025, filed for recall of order dated 03.09.2025 filed in Case No. 4896 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. D 202504680004896) - Murali Vs. State of U.P. and Others, U/S 30(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Chief Revenue Officer, Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Chief Revenue Officer, Sultanpur, is directed to decide Recall Application dated 11.09.2025, filed for recall of order dated 03.09.2025 filed in Case No. 4896 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. D 202504680004896) - Murali Vs. State of U.P. and Others, U/S 30(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Shukla, Kaushlendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Baijnath Prajapati .....Petitioner(s) Chief Revenue Officer, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench