- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17195 MFA No. 7759 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7759 OF 2018(MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DEVARAJAMMA, W/O. SHIVARAMU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 2. SRI. SHIVARAMU, S/O. RANGE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. SRI. VINAY KUMAR .S. S/O. SHIVARAMU, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHILUR POST, MARALAVADI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GOPAL L.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NAGARAJU .C, S/O. CHANNAPPA, MAJOR, R/O ANJANAPURA VILLAGE, THUNGANI POST, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. (R.C.OWNER OF THE TEMPO BEARING REG NO.KA-41-A-1703) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17195 MFA No. 7759 of 2018 2. SRI. RENUKAPPA .G, MAJOR, R/O.NO.251/8, ANJENAYA SWAMY STREET, UTTARAHALLI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA. (OWNER OF THE TEMPO BEARING REG.NO.KA-41-A1703 AS PER INSURANCE POLICY). 3. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.141, 4TH FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, SRISHANTHI TOWER, EAST OF NGEF LAYOUT, KASTHURINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 043. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED26.04.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.1078/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE 8TH ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE, 33RD ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-5), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is of the year 2018. Even till now the notices are not served on the respondents and no steps are been taken by the appellants. When this matter came up before the Co- ordinate of this Court on 24.02.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Again when the matter came up before this Court on 17.04.2025, as there was - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17195 MFA No. 7759 of 2018 no representation on behalf of the appellants, this matter was directed to be listed on 23.04.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today also there is no representation by the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6