HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6160 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to opposite party No.1 i.e. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Revision No.1794/2021, computerized case No.R20210955001794 (Satyaveer Vs. Chandaru) under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing counsel has no objection, if direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the revision. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No.1794/2021, computerized case No.R20210955001794 (Satyaveer Vs. Chandaru) under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act,, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Verma, Deepansi, Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava, Mangal Sen Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Satyaveer .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue Thru. Chairman, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench