MOHD. YAMAN @ YAMAN SIDDIQUI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
NABAIL/1564/2025 · 2025-10-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1564 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.162 of 2024, under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Hindola, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that physical relation were formed by the applicant no.1 with the victim for a span of nine years on false pretext of marriage and subsequently the applicant no.1 married elsewhere. The age of the victim is around 21 years as per the FIR. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the relationship continued over a span of 9 years as stated in the statement and the age of the victim and considering the nature of allegations being highly improbable, the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicants Mohd. Yaman @ Yaman Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sheikh Wali Uz Zaman Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Yaman @ Yaman Siddiqui And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Siddiqui and Mohammad Qayoom be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on their furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties each to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
October 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1564 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench