KAMLESH CHANDRA AWASTHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/12585/2025 · 2025-10-28
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202501 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202501 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12585 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to revise pension of petitioner and consequent retiral dues of petitioner as per Rs.64,100/- which is the last-pay drawn by petitioner. Other post-retiral benefits consequent to such re-fixation has also been sought.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. the Deputy Commissioner (Head Quarter), Commissionerate, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 28, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mewa Ram Satyarthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Kamlesh Chandra Awasthi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench