Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20250 (KAR)

THE TAPCMS LIMITED v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (FOOD)

WP/56871/2016 · 2025-02-11

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6023 WP No. 56871 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 56871 OF 2016 (GM-PDS) BETWEEN: THE TAPCMS LIMITED, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ARIFULLA ASIFF.C.S., …PETITIONER [ABSENT] AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (FOOD), CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT, CHICKBALLAPUR - 561 207. 2. THE THASILDAR, CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR-561 207. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES, MARKETING FEDERATION BUILDING, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6023 WP No. 56871 of 2016 ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner - the TAPCMS Limited is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 15.12.2022, on that day, office was directed to show the name of the petitioner in the cause list and also Court notice was ordered to the petitioner. Accordingly, Court notice was issued and petitioner is served and unrepresented. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2016. Now we are in the month of February 2025. The petition is pending from nine years. As already noted above, though the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 19