HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1589 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant apprehending their arrest in Case Crime No.: 209 of 2025, Under Section 3(1) UP Ganagster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. 1986, Police Station : Bhiti, District : Ambedkar Nagar. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case as well as in the sole case mentioned in the gang chart. In that case, he has been released on bail. The bail order is on record as Annexure No. 4 to the bail application. Apart from the sole case mentioned in the gang chart, there is no other case pending against the accused applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused Ravikant @ Rinku Yadav has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 17.10.2025 passed in criminal misc. anticipatory bail application U/S 482 BNSS No. 1557 of 2025. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks parity with the order of the co-accused. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that if the accused is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Himanshu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raj Bahadur @ Raj Bahadur Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P.Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) granted anticipatory bail, he undertakes to comply with all conditions imposed by the Court. He shall fully cooperate with the investigation and shall not misuse the liberty granted to him. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the anticipatory bail application. On due consideration to the fact that in one case shown in the gang chart, he has been enlarged on bail; co-accused Ravikant @ Rinku Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail, and in view of the undertaking given on their behalf to cooperate with the trial, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicant is entitled to be granted anticipatory bail, in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal and others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another, (2020) 5 SCC 1, subject to their cooperation in the trial. In view of the above, the accused-applicant, Raj Bahadur @ Raj Bahadur Yadav, is directed to surrender before the trial court within a period of twenty days from today. Upon his surrender, the trial court shall release him on anticipatory bail, subject to his furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each of the same amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court, with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall refrain from directly or indirectly inducing, threatening, or promising any person familiar with the facts of the case in a manner that may dissuade them from revealing such facts before the Court or result in tampering with the evidence; (ii) The applicant shall not travel outside India without prior permission from the Court; (iii) The applicant shall not attempt to influence or intimidate any prosecution witness; (iv) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on all scheduled dates unless specifically exempted from personal appearance; (v) In the event of any violation of the aforementioned conditions, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail granted to the applicant; Any other reasonable restrictions/conditions which the trial court may deem fit and proper can be imposed. It is made clear that the observations made in granting bail to the NABAIL No. 1589 of 2025 2 applicant shall not in any way affect the trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed. October 28, 2025 R.C. NABAIL No. 1589 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench