FLIPKART INTERNET PVT. LTD. THRU. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. KARUNESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/2456/2024 · 2025-10-28
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2456 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. This Court had passed the following order on 22.04.2024:-
"Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to correct the prayer number- I, during course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of F.I.R. dated 08.02.2024 bearing Case Crime/FIR No.0031/2024, for the offence under Sections 406 & 420 I.P.C., at Police Station Gomti Nagar Extension District Lucknow.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is accompanied with and regularly engaged with the said business and there are no any fraud played by the petitioner with the company. Entire FIR is false and is contrary to the settled procedure, which is duly followed on delivery of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aishwarya Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Representative Mr. Karunesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
goods. A case for consideration is made out. Issue notice to opposite party No.3. Let pleadings be exchanged with four weeks. List this case after four weeks. Considering the submission made, it is provided that the petitioner shall not be arrested on the basis of the impugned First Information Report, unless and until there is sufficient and cogent evidence available against him regarding commission of the offence. He will get his statement recorded before the Police as and when he is called. If he does not do so, then it can be made a ground for seeking vacation of this interim order. "
4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of paragraph No.7 of counter affidavit filed in the matter, submits that in this matter Charge Sheet has been forwarded on 19.03.2025 and also no rejoinder affidavit has been filed in reply to the counter affidavit. Thus, this petition has lost efficacy.
5. Dismissed accordingly.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 28, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 2456 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench