SARITA SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9877/2025 · 2025-10-28
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202491 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202491 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9877 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 03.10.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0233 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 74, 115, 352 and 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Indira Nagar, District- Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in the FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas the police is trying to arrest the petitioners, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 5. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondent-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273, and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Tripathi, Devendra Kumar, Rajiv Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sarita Shukla And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
(Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. However, it is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 4.11.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation.
Thereafter, they shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. October 28, 2025 Praveen/Anuj CRLP No. 9877 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench