Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20249 (KAR)

SYED SALMAN KHOMAINI v. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION

WP/5092/2019 · 2025-01-21

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2446 WP No. 5092 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 5092 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SYED SALMAN KHOMAINI S/O. MIR ASHAK HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, ADVOCATE, ENROLMENT NO: KAR/37/2016, NO.53, GROUND FLOOR, 4TH "A" CROSS, NEAR SHIA MASJID, ANEPALYA, AUDOGODI POST, BANGALORE-560 031, MOBILE-7760283452. …PETITIONER [ABSENT] AND: 1. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION, BANGALORE, BY ITS PRESIDENT, VAKILARA BHAVANA, CITY CIVIL COURT COMPOUND, BENGALURU-560 009. 2. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION, BANGALORE, JOINT SECRETARY, MAYO HALL UNIT, MAYO HALL COURT COMPLEX, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, MAHADEVAPURA POLICE STATION, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2446 WP No. 5092 of 2019 BANGALORE-560 048. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R3 & R1; NOTICE TO R2-HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED:26.04.2019) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner is absent. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 20.01.2025, on that day, office was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and it was ordered to be listed on 20.01.2025. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from six years. As already noted above, though the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2446 WP No. 5092 of 2019 interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 24