Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20247 (GAU)

ON THE DEATH OF TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMTI DAISY KAKATI AND ORS v. SRI BHABESH BARUAH,

I.A.(Civil)/3142/2023 · 2025-06-10

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010029032015 2025:GAU-AS:7665 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RFA/30/2023 ON THE DEATH OF TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMTI DAISY KAKATI AND 3 ORS W/O TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI 2: SMTI BARNALI KAKATI 3: SMTI PRANATI KAKATI D/O TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI 4: PARAG KUMAR KAKATI S/O TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI ALL ARE R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE GUWAHATI- VERSUS SRI BHABESH BARUAH S/O SRI ACHYUT BARUAH, R/O JANAPUR, JATIA, KAHILIPARA, P.O. GUWAHATI-19 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. G KAKATI, MR.H J RAI,MR.J SHARMA,MR.P THAKURIA,MR. B M CHOUDHURY,MR G DAS Advocate for the Respondent : MR B K SARMA, MR. LENTSO,MR. K KALITA,MR Z MUKIT,MR. A SARMA,MR. D K KOTOKY Page No.# 2/5 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/3142/2023 ON THE DEATH OF TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMTI DAISY KAKATI AND ORS W/O TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI 2: SMTI BARNALI KAKATI D/O TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE GUWAHATI-3 3: SMTI PRANATI KAKATI D/O TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE GUWAHATI-3 4: PARAG KUMAR KAKATI S/O TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE GUWAHATI-3 5: MIRA RANI KAKATI D/O CHANDI CHARAN KAKATI R/O VILL. BORZHAR P.O. AGCHIA PS. AZARA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 6: BHUBANESWAR KALITA LEGAL HEIR OF NIRU KAKATI R/O VILLAGE BORKA P.O. PUB-BORKA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS SRI BHABESH BARUAH S/O SRI ACHYUT BARUAH R/O JANAKPUR JATIA KAHILIPARA P.O. GUWAHATI-19 Page No.# 3/5 DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR G DAS Advocate for : appearing for SRI BHABESH BARUAH Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/4062/2019 ON THE DEATH OF TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI HIS LEGAL HEIRS ARE SMTI DAISY KAKATI and 3 ORS W/O LATE TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE GUWAHATI 781003 IN THE DIST. OF KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 2: BARNALI KAKATI D/O LATE TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE GUWAHATI 781003 IN THE DIST. OF KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 3: PRANATI KAKATI D/O LATE TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE GUWAHATI 781003 IN THE DIST. OF KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 4: PARAG KUMAR KAKATI S/O LATE TIKENDRA NATH KAKATI R/O HOUSE NO. 6 CHANDMARI RED CROSS ROAD NABAGIRI PATH 1ST BYE LANE Page No.# 4/5 GUWAHATI 781003 IN THE DIST. OF KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. VERSUS BHABESH BARUAH S/O ACHYUT BARUAH R/O JANAKPUR JATIA KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 781019 ------------ Advocate for : MR G DAS Advocate for : appearing for BHABESH BARUAH BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 11-06-2025 Appellants/applicants are not represented today. 2. Learned counsel Mr. W. Rahman is present on behalf of learned counsel Mr. A. Sarma for the respondent/opposite party Bhabesh Baruah. 3. Office note dated 09.06.2025 indicates that further proceedings of this case have been stayed, awaiting the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 19572/2023 which has been placed on record. 4. Vide order dated 28.11.2024 passed in the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 19572/2023, I.A./1126/2016 condoning the delay of 917 days in filing the appeal was set aside and the I.A./1126/2016 has been dismissed by the order. Consequently, the present R.F.A. No. 30/2023 has also been dismissed vide the Page No.# 5/5 order dated 28.11.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 19572/2023. 5. Thereby, in compliance of the aforementioned order dated 28.11.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 19572/2023, R.F.A.30/2023 along with the connected interlocutory applications have been dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant