HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6144 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1-Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Misc. Application No.1706/2025, computerized case No.R20250955001706 (Satyaveer Vs. Rajpal) under Section 202 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Misc. Application No.1706/2025, computerized case No.R20250955001706 (Satyaveer Vs. Rajpal) under Section 202 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Verma, Deepansi, Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava, Mangal Sen Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Satyaveer .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue Thru.Chairman, Lucknow And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench