HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 30110 of 2021 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the compensation that has been ascertained/determined by the authorities. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the said compensation has been challenged by the petitioner before the arbitrator/District Magistrate, who is the competent authority under Section 3(g)(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956. He has relied upon the judgement of this Court passed in Writ - C No.26529 of 2025; Ramashankar Yadav and another versus Union of India and others; Neutral Citation No.2025:AHC:184127-DB. 4. In light of the same, this writ petition cannot survive. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise all points of law before the arbitrator including the area that has been acquired and the quantum of compensation. October 28, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Shukla, Ram Shubham Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Deep Mala Shukla, Sarvesh Kumar Dubey (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ram Chandra Shukla .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru Secy. Ministry Of Rural Development Delhi And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench