HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 879 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. October 28, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kirti Kar Tripathi, Mamta Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., I.P. Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Bhupendra Nath Tiwari And 21 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Urban Development Lucknow Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench