MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/9934/2025 · 2025-10-28
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202444 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202444 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9934 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. (I.A. No.Nil of 2025)
1. By means of the instant application, the petitioner seeks to implead Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank (earstwhile Prathma U.P. Gramin Bank) through its Branch Manager, Branch- Swami Narayan, Chhapiya, District- Gonda as the respondent No.4.
2. Shri Avinash Pal, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank and he has no objection against the said application.
3. Accordingly, the impleadment application is allowed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to incorporate necessary corrections in the writ petition forthwith. (Order on petition)
1. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to delete the endorsement of mortgage from the revenue records which was made when the petitioner has mortgaged the agricultural land for taking a loan. The petitioner has already repaid the loan and the mortgage has been redeemed but the revenue record has not been corrected.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent No.4 admits that the entire amount of the loan has been repaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Noorain Husain Khan(Niazi), Mohd. Waris Farooqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mushtaq Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Shri Vikas Rai, the learned State Counsel states that the revenue record has already been corrected and an endorsement has been made that the mortgage stands redeemed. He further states that from the next fasli year, the factum of property earlier having mortgaged shall be deleted from the Khatauni.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the petitioner's grievance stands redressed and the petition has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 28, 2025 -Amit K- WRIC No. 9934 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench