Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202441 (ALL)

VINVANT KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY.. (HOME) LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1565/2025 · 2025-10-28

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1565 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Dinesh Kumar Verma, who has filed his vakalatnama today on behalf of informant and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.262 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85, 92 BNS and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mahmoodabad, District Sitapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that sister of the informant was married to son of the applicant and subsequently entire matrimonial family killed her. The cause of death as per post mortem report is shock and as per statement of Doctor the cause of death was on account of shock. The applicant is the mother in law. 4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the allegations have been levelled against the entire matrimonial family and there is nothing specific against the applicant who is the mother in law aged about 45 years, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Farhan Alam Osmany, Mohd. Badiul Madar, Mohd. Islam Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinvant Kumari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.. (Home) Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Vinvant Kumari be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on her furnishing personal bond of Rs 5000 to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1565 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench