1 2025:CGHC:20838-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1566 of 2025 1 - Naveen Pathak S/o Nandkumar Pathak Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Puchheli, P.S. Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Nandkumar Pathak S/o Late Durgaprasad Pathak Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Puchheli, P.S. Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Anita Pathak W/o Nandkumar Pathak Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Puchheli, P.S. Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Ram Alias Hemant Pathak S/o Nandkumar Pathak Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Puchheli, P.S. Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Piparchhedi, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Station House Officer Police Station- Piparchhedi, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Megha Pathak W/o Naveen Pathak Aged About 29 Years R/o Village- Puchheli, P.S. Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. Presently R/o Village- Near Police Station Piparchhedi, Police Station Piparchhedi, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Kumar Khatri, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.05.07 16:55:04 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 07.05.2025 1. Heard Mr. Krishna Kumar Khatri, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents No.1 & 2 / State. 2. The petitioners has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “ अतःप्रार्थना है कि माानीय न्यायालय इस याचिा ो स्वीार रने ी ृ पा रते हुए न्यायाकिहत मे एफ.आई. आर संख्या- 01/2025, कि%नां-15/01/2025, और %ाण्डि() प्ररण मां- 259/2025, बी.एन.एन.एस. ी धारा-85,3 (5) े आरोप संबधी आ%ेश एंव आरोप पत्र रद्द रने ी आ%ेश %ेने ी असीम ृ पा ” रे। 3. On a pointed query being made to the learned counsel for the petitioners as to why he has not mentioned and challenged the order taking cognizance, he could not give any satisfactory answer to the same. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Main Road, Bagbahra, District- Mahasamund (C.G.). 3 6. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondents No.1 & 2 / State is present. 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet