Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20243 (AP)

ADDALA NAGESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14268/2025 · 2025-07-13

R Raghunandan Rao, Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHCOI 0283332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE AND the honourable smt. justice WRIT PETITION NO: 142fi« np 0fgS 0S R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO SUMATHI JAGADAM 2025 Between: Addala Nageswara Rao Agriculture, R/o. H.No. Godavari District. S/o. Someswara Rao (late), 5-160/1, Kontheru Village, Elamanchili Aged 49 years, Occ; Mandal, West ...Petitioner AND 1- The State of Andhra Pradesh Home Department, Secretariat, 2. The Director General '■ Represented by its Principle Secretary Amaravati. of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. Office the Director General of Police, 3. The Superintendent of Police West Godavari District. Bhimavaram. of Police, Narasapuram, 4. The Deputy Superintendent District. West Godavari 5. The Inspector of Police, Godavari District. 6. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Godavari District. 7. Karneedi Gurrayya, S/o. i Police, Elamanchili Police Station Palakol Rural Police Station, Palakol, West Elamanchili Police Station Elamanchili, West Not known to the Petitioner, Occ; Sub-Inspector of Elamanchili, West Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the Respondents 4 to 6 to produce Addala L.N.V. Sai Someswar, S/o. Nageswara Rao, who is aged about 19 years from their illegal custody, before the Hon'ble Court and direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to initiate action against the 6*^ Respondent, for the illegal detention of the detainee. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010283332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3541] MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14268/2025 Between: 1.ADDALA NAGESWARA RAO, S/0. SOMESWARA RAO (LATE), AGED 49 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/0. H.NO. 5-160/1, KONTHERU VILLAGE, ELAMANCHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, OFFICE THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM. 4.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAKOL RURAL POLICE STATION, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, ELAMANCHILI POLICE STATION, ELAMANCHILI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7.KARNEEDIGURRAYYA, S/0 NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER OCC SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, STATION, ELAMANCHILI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ELAMANCHILI POLICE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the Respondents 4 to6 to produce Addala L.N.V. Sai Someswar, S/o. Nageswara Rao, who is aged about 19 years from their illegal custody, before the Hon'ble Court and direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to initiate action against the 6th Respondent, for the illegal detention of the detainee and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL iS-' The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required in this matter and seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT R^ISTRAR SECr(oN OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri Rambabu Koppineedi, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Tw9,CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of Andhra AmaravatitOUTj " 3. Twd CO Copies Pradesh at Cnr HIGH COURT DATED: 14/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 14268 OF 2025 I II SEP 2025 ^ . Current aeciion %S^iPSl»ATC»<^^ DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS