- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22571-DB WA No. 383 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 383 OF 2023 (KLRA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. N. KRISHNASWAMY IYENGAR SINCE DEAD, BY HIS LRS SRI. K. KESHAVA IYENGAR S/O LATE SRI. N. KRISHNASWAMY IYENGAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 2. SRI. K. JAYARAMU S/O LATE N. KRISHNASWAMY IYENGAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT. NARAYANAGHATTA VILLAGE MUTHANALLUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 106 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MITHUN G.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22571-DB WA No. 383 of 2023 2. LAND TRIBUNAL REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY ANEKAL 3. THIMMAKKA SINCE DEAD, REP BY LRS SMT. AMMAYYA D/O LATE THIMMAKKA W/O RAMAREDDY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT. NARAYANGHATTA VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU 4. SMT. PAPAMMA D/O LATE THIMMAKKA W/O LATE RAMAREDDY MAJOR R/AT. NARAYANGHATTA VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 5. SRI. B.S. SHIVARAMA S/O B.P. SIDDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT. HOSABOODANUR HALE BOODANUR POST MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHWETA KRISHNAPPA, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. KESHAVARAJU T.T., ADVOCATE FOR C/R5) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE PASSED IN W. P. No.29272/1996 (KLRA), DATED 02.11.2022, HOLDING THAT THE PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS ARE THE ABSOLUTE OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, BY ALLOWING THIS MEMORANDUM OF WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22571-DB WA No. 383 of 2023 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) When the matter was called out, there is no appearance for the appellants. 2. It is noticed that inspite of granting sufficient opportunities, appellants have not complied with the office objections. On 14.10.2024, finally, a week's time was granted subject to payment of cost of Rs.7,000/. It appears that the appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49