HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1410/2025 in SB Civil Writ Petition No. 7608/2023 Dhruva Educational Society, Having Its Registered Office, Plot No. A-2, Mahaveer Colony, Opposite Hotel Club Mahendra, Old Ramgarh Road, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Through Authorized Signatory Usha Katariya W/o Ravindrra Kataria, Aged About 45 Years, Mahaveer Colony, Opposite Hotel Club Mahendra, Old Ramgarh Road, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Presently Holding The Post Of Secretary, ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Krishan Kunal, The Principal Secretary Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Sitaram Jat, Director Of Primary And Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner, Raj. 3. Sunil Kumar Singhal, District Education officer, Jaipur (First), Shikshasankual, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D S Dhariwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 23/02/2026 1. It is informed by learned counsel for the respondent that vide order dated 17.12.2025, representation submitted by petitioner was decided. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in para-6 of the order dated 16.07.2025, the court considered and opined that "three days delay in filing of application is not fatal and the same (2 of 2) [CCP-1410/2025] should not have been rejected on this technical count alone". It is contended that after submitting the representation the respondent have dismissed the representation on the grounds of delay, therefore they have not complied with the order and made contempt of the court. 3. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 4. Annexure CPR/1 was passed by the concerned authority on 17.12.2025. Dismissal of the petitioner's representation was based not only on the basis of delay but with regard to other aspects also. The Office order also reflects that petitioner submitted his representation assigning several reasons and after considering all the reasons cited in the representation, the representation was decided. No contempt is made out, if petitioner is still aggrieved by the said order passed by the respondent then the petitioner is free to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. 5. The contempt petition stands disposed of. The rule is discharged. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /34