HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9032 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking following main relief(s):- "Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct to the trial court concerned not to insist the petitioner to file separate sureties and personal bond in each and every case and accept sureties and personal bond in lieu of all cases in view of judgment rendered by the apex court in SLP (Criminal)." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in thirteen cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District- Ayodhya are indicated in paragraphs 5 to 17 of this application, which are extracted hereunder:- "5. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.175/2020 under section 303,41/411 of I.P.C, P.S - Patranga, District- Ayodhya by the this Hob'ble court in bail Application No. 11755/2024. 6. That bail of the petitioner in case crime no. 475/2020 U/S 392, 34 of I.P.C and he has granted on bail vide order dated 01.06.2024 passed by the district session judge Ayodhya/Faizabad. 7. That bail of accused / applicant has been granted in. Case crime no. 417/2020, U/S 307/41/411 of 1.P.C., P.S Khandasa, District-Ayodhya by this Hon'ble court vide order 3.11.2023 in bail application No. 12863/2023. 8. That bail application of accused/ applicant in case crime no. 351/2020 U/S/-307, 394, 34, 411 I.P.C, P.S Khandasa, district- Ayodhya has been granted by this Hob'ble court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arvind Mali @ Pappu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) vide order dated 17.08.2023 in bail Application No. 10266/2023. 9. That bail application of accused/applicant in case crime no. 143/13 U/S 457,380,411, of L.P.C, P.S Raunahi, District Faizabad, has been allowed by District and session judge vide order dated 14.2.2014. 10. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no. 146/2013 under section 401 of LP.C, P.S Raunahi, District Faizabad by the Trial court faizabad. 11. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.418/2020 under section 3/25 of Arms act, P.S Khandasa, district-Ayodhya by the Trail court. 12. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.475/2020 under section 392, 34 of 1.P.C, P.S Inayatnagar, district-Ayodhya by the C.J.M (III) court Ayodhya. 13. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.477/2021 under section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster Act, P.S Inayatnagar, district- Ayodhya by this Hon'ble court vide order dated 06/03/2025. 14. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.101/2013 under section 380,411,457 of I.P.C, P.S - Kotwali Nagar, district- Ayodhya by the court concerned. 15. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.108/2013 under section 380,475 of I.P.C, P.S Rudauli, district-Ayodhya by the Trial court. 16. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.147/2013 under section 308,457 of I.P.C, P.S Raunahi, district-Ayodhya. 17. That bail of accused applicant has been granted in case crime no.148/2013 under section 380,411,457 of I.P.C, P.S district- Ayodhya by the court concerned." 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. 5. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. 6. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. October 17, 2025 Arun/- A482 No. 9032 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench