APHC010283372013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26912/2013 Between: 1. K.K.RAO ENGINEERING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED, HAVING OFFICE AT PLOT NO. PART OF 8, ROAD NO.1, IDL, NACHARAM, HYDERABAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI K.KOTESHWAR RAO. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION, APSPDCL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TRANSFORMERS, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. M/S N V ELECTRICALS 29295, VIDYANAGAR, VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or a writ and more particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent directing the petitioner to vacate the SPM premises, Macherla, Guntur circle is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 19(i)(g) of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the letter bearing No.DE/TRS/GNT/AE/T/F. No/D.No.1256/2013, dated 03-09-2013 issued by the Divisional Engineer, Transformers, Guntur, the second respondent herein and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 33303 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the letter bearing No.DE/TRS/GNT/AE/T/F.No/D.No.1256/2013, dated 03-09-2013 issued by the Divisional Engineer, Transformers, Guntur, the second respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. P VINOD KUMAR The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed on 09.07.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 11.07.2025 KA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25931/2013 Date: 11.07.2025 KA