JAGDAMBA @ JAGDAMBA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10182/2025 · 2025-10-16
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10182 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent(s) on the application of the petitioner dated 20.06.2025 for protecting the lawful possession over the land in dispute.
3. Upon hearing counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perusing the record, we are of the view that the petitioner should file an application under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. If such an application is filed within a period of two weeks, the authority concerned is directed to decide the said application expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months thereafter from the date of production of certified copy of this order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the respondent(s) therein.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Jagdamba @ Jagdamba Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench