TARUN KUMAR S/O RAMPRAKASH v. RADHESHYAM GHODAWAT S/O LATE SHRI MALIRAM
CW/10120/2024 · 2025-08-19
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20236 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20236 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10120/2024
1. Tarun Kumar S/o Ramprakash, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 60/97, Rajat Path Behind Of Bank Of Baroda, Mansarovar, Jaipur.
2. Vishnu Prakash S/o Late Shri Poonam Chand Poddar, Aged About 69 Years, R/o 60/97, Rajat Path Behind Of Bank Of Baroda, Mansarovar, Jaipur.
3. Ravi Poddar S/o Late Shri Poonam Chand Poddar, Aged About 64 Years, R/o B-342, Janta Colony, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Radheshyam Ghodawat S/o Late Shri Maliram, R/o Plot No. A-65 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
2. Renu Daughter Of Late Shri Poonam Chand Poddar, R/o 60/97 Rajat Path, Behind Of Bank Of Baroda, Mansarovar Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K.Sharma-Sr.Advocate with Mr. Madhav Dadhich JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 19/08/2025
1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise and the petitioners have vacated the rental premises and possession of the same has been handed over to the respondent-landlord. Hence, under the changed circumstances, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
(2 of 2) [CW-10120/2024]
2. Considering the statement made by counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition stands dismissed as rendered infructuous.
3. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/96