IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CWP-2829-2025 Date of Decision : May 20, 2025 SATYA KUMARI -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Ajit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had earlier also approached this Court, through instituting CWP-24276-2024, for claiming the relief, as yearned now in the instant writ petition. Vide order dated 26.11.2024, the said writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn, but, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative efficacious remedy in accordance with law. 2. The petitioner has, instead of taking recourse to the alternative statutory remedy and merely by making a representation before the Deputy Commissioner on 12.12.2024, again approached this Court for issuance of directions upon the respondents No.2 and 3 to consider her case for allotment of Canteen situated in Civil Hospital, Panipat. 3. Moreover, despite number of opportunities being given to the petitioner’s counsel, he failed to substantiate the legal right of the DEVINDER YADAV 2025.05.21 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-2829-2025 2 petitioner in respect of the claim (supra). Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed being devoid of merits. (KULDEEP TIWARI) May 20, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.05.21 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment