Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202358 (ALL)

AKASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/2845/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2845 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Bhopesh Singh Bisht and Shri Arpit Kumar, Advocates holding brief of Shri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.28 of 2025 under Sections 103(1), 238(1), 61(2) IPC, P.S.- Kotwali Tanda, District- Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was not named in the FIR, his name was surfaced in the present case on the basis of statement of the co-accused person who has already been granted bail vide order dated 15.07.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3945 of 2025. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the ground of parity coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 25.01.2025 and is having criminal history of one minor offence, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Akash Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Anas Siddiqui, Nadeem Murtaza, Sanat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akash Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 2845 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench