Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202337 (ALL)

SAROJ KUMAR @ SAROJ KUMAR VERMA v. ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT NO 48 BARABANKI AND ANOTHER

A483/884/2025 · 2025-10-16

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 884 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.23, Barabanki to decide the Complaint Case No. 883 of 2023, Saroj Kumar Versus Shay Mohammad, under Section 138 of NI Act, Police Station Fatehpur, District Barabanki, pending before him, expeditiously within the stipulated time frame, fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 3. The aforesaid case of the applicant is pending since the year 2023. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that under Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, it is provided that every trial under this Section shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. He has submitted that since long time, the case is pending without substantial progress. 4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and accordingly expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case in accordance with law. 5. This application stands disposed of. October 16, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Singh, Abhishek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Verma .....Applicant(s) Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No 48 Barabanki And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench