HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1538 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 264 of 2024, 2419300/Ss. 406 & 420 IPC, Police Station - Amethi District Amethi. It is alleged in the prosecution case that the applicant, in connivance with the co-accused persons, induced the complainant to invest in land. It is alleged that between 2016 and 2022, the complainant, having sold his land, disposed of his wife’s jewellery, and borrowed money from his relatives, paid a total sum of Rs. 1,03,14,000/- to the applicant and the co-accused persons. However, instead of utilizing the said amount for purchasing the plot, the applicant and his associates misappropriated the money and spent it elsewhere. Learned A.G.A. submits that in Parcha No. 4 of the case diary, the statement of the applicant was examined by the Investigating Officer, who found that an amount of Rs. 70,000/- had been transferred from the complainant’s account to the applicant’s account on 13.07.2021. It is further submitted that the learned trial court, while rejecting the anticipatory bail application, has duly taken note of this fact. Perused the record.A perusal of the rejection order shows that the prima Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Birendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Imran .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) facie involvement of the applicant is evident. The relevant portion of the order is reproduced below: "्ऺाथिमकी के अवलोकन से स्प्ि है िक वादी मुकदमा ्षारा ्ऺाथर्/अिभयुका के भी खाते में धनरािश अन्तिरत की गयी है तथा वादी ने अपने बयान अन्तगर्त धारा 161 दं०्ऺ०सं० में भी स्प्ि रूप से यह उिल्लिखत िकया है िक उसके ्षारा अन्य अिभयु्वों के साथ-साथ ्ऺाथर् / अिभयु्व के खाते में िदनांक 13.07.2021 को रू0 70,000/- अन्तिरत िकया गया था, िजसकी पुि्ि के स डायरी के पचार् सं0 4 में अवलोकन बैंक स्टेटमेन्ट वादी मुकदमा (खाता सं० 08820100021513) से भी होती है। ऐसे में ्ऺस्तुत ्ऺकरण की घटना में ्ऺाथर् / अिभयु्व की संिलप्तता से इन्कार नहीं िकया जा सकता है।" In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, considering that an amount of ₹70,000/- was received in the applicant’s account, which has already been noticed by the learned court below while rejecting the anticipatory bail application, it cannot be said that the present case is one of false implication or that the applicant has been implicated to tarnish his reputation. Hence, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. The anticipatory bail application is dismissed. October 16, 2025 R.C. NABAIL No. 1538 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench