Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202315 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR SONI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WPIL/1083/2025 · 2025-10-16

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1083 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.4 which is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. If the private opposite parties have encroached upon the Khalihan land then the remedy would be under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Petitioner may avail the said remedy and if that is not available in law then such other remedies as may be prescribed. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 Shanu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey, Namit Sharma (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Rajesh Kumar Soni .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench