ASHOK KUMAR S/O LATE SHRI UDAY SINGH KHINCHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8310/2025 · 2026-03-23
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2023 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2023 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 8310/2025 Ashok Kumar S/o Late Shri Uday Singh Khinchar, R/o Plot No. D-110, Indira Nagar Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Accused/Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Smt. Savitri Devi, W/o Late Shri Uday Singh Khinchar, Aged About 72 Years, R/o D-110, Indira Nagar, Jhunjhunu, Presently R/o Villa No. 86, Omaxe City, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP Mr. Ajay Poonia JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 23/03/2026
1. Parties have put in appearance in-person before this Court and they have been duly verified by their respective counsel.
2. On the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the instant petition has been preferred before this Court for quashing the proceedings of the impugned FIR No. 205/2025, registered with the Police Station Bagru, Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 303(2), 351(3), 79, 115(2) and 126(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant has entered into a compromise with the petitioner and now, she does not want to prosecute the petitioner. Counsel
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-8310/2025] submits that the complainant has also submitted the compromise deed before the Investigating Officer who has verified the same.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the compromise deed has been verified by the Investigating Officer.
5. The complainant is also present in-person and has expressed her desire that she does not want to prosecute the petitioner and she has no objection, in case the proceedings of the impugned FIR are quashed.
6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case as stated therein above and applying the principles of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688, this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke the inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed. The criminal proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR stands quashed and set-aside.
8. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
9. The verification report furnished by the SHO, Police Station Bagru is ordered to be retained on record.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Puneet/Ashu/13