Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2023 (AP)

KANUPARTHI PENCHALAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WA/217/2025 · 2026-06-17

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010119022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 217/2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent by the order made by the Learned Single Judgein l.A.No.l and 2 of 2024, (mistakenly typed asl.A.No.l and 2 of 2025 in Order) in W.P.No.15202/2024, dt 20.02.2025. Between: 1. KANUPARTHI PENCHALAIAH, , S/O K.SUBBAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3/58, OBANAPALLI, KODUR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPADISTRICT-516101. 2. KOMMANAYADAGIRI,, S/O.NAGARAJU, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O D.NO.19-140, IPURUPALEM(RURAL), PRAKASAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523166. 3. CHEKURIVENKATASATYASUBRAMANYAVARMA,, S/O.CH.RAMA CHANDRA VARMA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.75-6-22, PRAKASAH NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY URBAN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. Y.NANDEESH KUMAR,, S/O.Y,NAGARAJU, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-67, BC COLONY, GANTHIMARRIRAMAGARIMANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-515101 ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT 2 BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE A P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the impugned order of the Learned Hon’ble Single Judge made in I.A.N0.I and 2 of 2024 (mistakenly typed asl.A.No.1 and 2 of 2025 in Order) in W.P.No.15202/2024, dt 20.02.2025, by granting stay of ail further proceedings in pursuance of main examination held on 23.02.2025, in pursuance of the impugned Notification N0.II, dated 07-12-2023, including declaration of results, pending disposal of the present Writ Appeal in the Interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SEENA KUMAR 2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO. 217 of 2025 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Mr Bharath Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr G.V.Shivaji, learned counsel for the appellants on record would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Appeal nothing survives in this Writ Appeal for further adjudication and sought to dismiss this Writ Appeal as infructuous. 2. The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Dated: 18.06.2026 TM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO. 217 of 2025 Dated: 18.06.2026 TM