IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11305 of 2025 Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Pooja …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Mr. Rajesh Prakash, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Petitioner herein is aggrieved by order dated 09.06.2025, whereby representation filed by her, in terms of order dated 22.05.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No. 8506 of 2025, came to be rejected on the ground that no plausible explanation has been rendered on record for cancellation of transfer, coupled with the fact that no cogent and convincing evidence has been adduced on record suggestive of the fact that mother of the petitioner is suffering from a serious disease. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Having perused impugned order dated 09.06.2025 in its entirety, coupled with the fact that petitioner has been working in Keylong for more than nine years and she has been transferred to Triloknath, District Lahaul and Spiti, this Court sees no reason to interfere in the impugned order and as such, same is upheld. 3. In view of the above, present petition fails and dismissed accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 15, 2025 (Sunil)