1 2025:CGHC:18696 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 393 of 2020 1 - Smt. Ranjita Yadav W/o Shri Harish Yadav Aged About 23 Years Adhyaksha Jay Sawarin Dai Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Amora, Niwasi - Gram Amora, Tehsil - Nawagarh, Jila - Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Sachiv, Khadya, Nagrik Aapoorti Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Jila - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Jila - Janjgir, Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Jila Prabandhak Nagrik Aapoorti Nigam Janjgir Jila - Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Anuvibhagiy Adhikari Rajasva, Janjgir, Jila Janjgir Chmpa., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar Nawagarh, Jila Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, Jila Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 7 - Khadya Nirikshak Janjgir Jila Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 8 - Khadya Nirikshak Nawagarh Jila Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None. For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, P.L. For Respondent No. 3/ NAN : Mr. Imam Siddiqui, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.04.25 14:10:09 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 24-04-2025 1) Petitioner has filed this petition assailing the order passed by the SDO(R), Janjgir dated 02.07.2020 whereby the operation of Fair Price Shop situated at Village- Amora being operated by the petitioner’s society has been cancelled. 2) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respective respondents submit that the order impugned is appealable according to the provisions of Clause 18 of the PDS Control Order, 2016, therefore, this petition is not maintainable and deserves to be dismissed. 3) Taking into consideration the fact that there is efficacious alternative remedy available to the petitioner to prefer appeal before the concerned Collector as per Clause 18 of the PDS Control Order, 2016, in the opinion of this Court, this petition is not maintainable. 4) Consequently, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. However, petitioner would be at liberty to avail the remedy available under law. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya