Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202248 (ALL)

SHIVRANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1534/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1534 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.441 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 108 BNS and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Tambaur, District Sitapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that sister of informant was married to son of applicant around 14 years ago. The entire matrimonial family used to harass her. Subsequently her body was found in a river. The cause of death as per post mortem report is ante mortem drowning. The applicant is mother in law. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the general nature of allegations and the age of the applicant, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Shivrani be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on her furnishing personal bond of Rs Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Pandey, Akhil Anand Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shivrani .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 10000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 16, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1534 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench