Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202242 (ALL)

DILIP KUMAR KAPOOR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12304/2025 · 2025-10-16

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12304 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Miss Shivangi Pandey, advocate, holding brief of Mr. Kaushlendra Tewari, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3, Mr. Parmanand Asthana, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "i. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opp. party no.2 i.e. Managing Director, U.P. State Food Essential Corporation Limited 17, Gokhle Marg, Lucknow to pay the leave encashment, gratuity, amount of security deposit and to pay fixation of fifth and sixth pay commission, after the retirement of the petitioner, within a stipulated time period, in the interest of Justice. ii. Issue any other writ order or direction in the nature and manner, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper and just in the circumstances of the case. iii. Allow the petition with cost." It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner was retired on 30.06.2021 from the respondent department and he has not been paid the retiral dues as yet. He submitted that the petitioner may be given liberty to move a fresh representation while claiming the retiral dues before the respondent no. 2 and the respondent no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels appearing for the respondents have no objections to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meva Lal Yadav, Harshita Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushlendra Tewari Dilip Kumar Kapoor .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Food And Civil Supplies Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation within a period of 15 days claiming his retiral dues and on such claim made through the representation, the respondent no. 2/Managing Director, U.P. State Food Essential Corporation Ltd. shall take decision within further period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12304 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench