HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12222 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material on record. Notice to the respondent no.6 is dispensed with as the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage itself. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "I. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No. 3 and 4 to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of L.T. Grade Teacher in Dayanand Kanya Inter College, Mahanagar, Lucknow in terms of Section 33-G (b) of U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982. II. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay selection Grade w.e.f. 01.07.2004 and the promotional pay scale w.e.f. 01.07.2016 to the petitioner. III. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the regular pension to the petitioner w.e.f. 01.04.2021 in terms of relevant provision of Uttar Pradesh Contributory Provident Fund Insurance Pension Rules, 1964 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Om Prakash Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shobhana Raizada .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) IV. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay 6% interest on the delayed payment of pension to the petitioner till it is actually paid to her." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working since long back and she has retired on 31.3.2021 but the department has not considered the regularisation of the services of the petitioner during her service period and other consequential benefits have not been paid thereafter. After the aforesaid arguments, he submits that the interest of justice would be subserved if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 17.9.2025 within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the respondent no.4 is directed to decide the representation dated 17.9.2025 within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12222 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench