APHC010284312009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2166/2009 Between: 1. THOTA NAGA SIROMANI, & ANOTHER,, WIDOW OF KOTI SWAMY, R/O OPPOSITE TO SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, PONNUR. 2. THOTA SRINVIASA RAO,, S/O KOTI SWAMY, AGRICULTURE, R/O OPPOSITE TO SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, PONNUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THOTA VENKATA RAMANA 2 OTHERS, W/O SUBBA RAO, BUSINESS, R/O OPPOSITE TO SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, PONNUR. 2. THOTA LAKSHMI NARAYANA, S/O KOTI SWAMY, AGRICULTURE, R/O OPPOSITE TO SAHASRALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, PONNUR. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD, THROUGH SHO., PONNUR TALUKA PS., PONNUR, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. V S R ANJANEYALU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Khaja Shaik, learned Counsel representing Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 17.02.2025 VTS