HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9170 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Ms. Divya Singh, Advocate who has filed her vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.6. 2. The petitioner Nos.1 & 2 as well as the respondent No.6 are present in Court, who have been identified by their respective counsels. 3. The instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent Nos.2 to 6 not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners after 18 years of performing the marriage under Hindu rituals and practices on 24.11.2007 and for returning back the various items of the petitioner No.1 held in the custody of the respondent No.6 her father with whom she was residing since the previous four months. 4. The said items are said to be a laptop, the credit card and the clothing of the petitioner No.1. 5. This Court, vide order dated 07.10.2025, had required the respondent No.6 to appear in person before this Court. 6. The respondent No.6, who is the father of the petitioner No.1, states that he has never interfered in the married life of the petitioners rather the petitioner No.1, who is his daughter, has been residing peacefully with the family. He further states that in case the petitioner No.1 has any grievance against him, he has had no intention of interfering in the married life of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vandana Singh, Devesh Kumar Verma, Nisha Kumari, Vijay Shyam Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Neha Amit Sahu And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) petitioners. 7. Shri Jagga, the respondent No.6 further states that he has brought the laptop, the credit card and other clothing items of the petitioner No.1 which would be handed over to the petitioner No.1 in the Court today itself. 8. Let the items be handed over by the respondent No.6 through his counsel to the petitioner No.1 through her counsel in the Court today itself. 9. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a mandamus commanding the respondents not to interfere in the married life of the petitioners. October 16, 2025 S. Shivhare CRLP No. 9170 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench