Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202226 (ALL)

ARPIT PAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF VOCATIONAL EDU. SKILL DEVE. AND ENTERPRE. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12229/2025 · 2025-10-16

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12229 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 15.09.2025 whereby his posting has been effected to the State Industrial Training Institute, Dahgava, Baduan, U.P. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner, on the basis of instructions, submits that since impugned order has been passed as a measure of posting after his promotion, he is not pressing challenge to the said order but seeks a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's posting in terms of his option considering his ill-health. 4. Since grievance as raised by petitioner would lie within domain of the executive, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Desh Deepak Singh, Rajat Srivastava, Sachin Tulsi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arpit Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Vocational Edu. Skill Deve. And Enterpre. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) party No.2, i.e., Director, Directorate of Training and Employment, Rozgar Bhawan, Guru Govind Singh Marg, Lucknow, UP, who shall consider and decide petitioner's representation, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition is finally disposed of. October 16, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 12229 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench