Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202216 (ALL)

RAJESH SINGH AND 10 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/837/2024 · 2025-10-16

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 837 of 2024 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners admits to the assertion of Shri Mohan Singh, learned Counsel for the Gaon Sabha that the panchayat bhawan which was constructed within the precincts of the temple has been removed/shifted, however, Shri Mohan Singh says that in spite of Gaon Sabha having passed a resolution dated 03.10.2024 for construction of the panchayat bhawan on gata No.1517 (घ) as forwarded by a letter dated 05.10.2024 of the Block Development concerned the said proposal has not been approved as yet by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, Sultanpur. Let Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, Sultanpur take a decision on the resolution of the Gaon Sabha referred hereinabove, if it has been received in his office at the earliest say within one month. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of as nothing survives for adjudication. October 16, 2025 -Piyush- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Rajesh Singh And 10 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchayati Raj U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench