MUMTAZ AHMAD v. SHRI DEEPAK VERMA, S.D.O., RANIGANJ, PRATAPGARH
CAPL/4264/2024 · 2025-10-16
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202211 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202211 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4264 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Case has been called in the revised list. Neither the learned counsels for the applicant are present nor any request has been made on their behalf for adjournment of the case. In view of above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Notice, if any, stands discharged. October 16, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Salik Ram Tiwari, Arti Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Mumtaz Ahmad .....Applicant(s) Shri Deepak Verma, S.D.O., Raniganj, Pratapgarh .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench