Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20221 (RAJ)

HANUMAN S/O BABLU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6936/2025 · 2025-08-21

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33282] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6936/2025 Hanuman S/o Bablu, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Aakodiya, Police Station Rawanjana Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Man Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Hanuman S/o Bablu in FIR No. 137/2025 dated 01.05.2025 registered at P.S. Kotwali District -Sawaimadhopur, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3) and 338 of BNS. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further [2025:RJ-JP:33282] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6936/2025] assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submits that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that only on complaint of police, instant case has been registered on suspicion and during investigation, no victim or complainant came forward to establish that petitioner has committed cheating or cyber crime with said person. He also submitted that only on general allegations, the case has been registered and after investigation only on omnibus statement, a charge-sheet has been filed against him. He further submitted that petitioner is a young person and he is not having any criminal antecedents. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On the basis of information, present petitioner was intercepted by Jhon Singh ASI, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Sawaimadhopur on alleged act of online cheating, betting, illegal transfer of fund and online gambling. The matter is investigated and charge-sheet has been filed against petitioner. The petitioner was arrested on 01.05.2025 and since then he is in custody. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in [2025:RJ-JP:33282] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6936/2025] the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Hanuman S/o Bablu, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /77