ROHIT SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/1490/2024 · 2025-10-16
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202209 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202209 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1490 of 2024 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Case called out. 2. Shri Dharmendra Gupta has stated that he has been instructed on behalf of opposite party no.3 to appear in this case. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the Complaint Case and the summoning order dated 18.11.2023 as it relates to the petitioners and all the further action in pursuance of the Complaint Case and its proceeding contained as Annexure No. 2 and 6 to this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. filed by the applicants in Complaint Case No. 4359/2023, under Section 12 Domestic Violence Act, Police Station Ashiyana , Lucknow, District Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants after arguing at some length, he has stated that he does not want to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and will appear before the court below and they will cooperate in the proceedings. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move bail application in light of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailender Singh, Ankit Tiwari, Divya Niranjan, Neelam Singh, Varun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dharmendra Gupta Rohit Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021, before the court concerned and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law. 6. In view of the above, the application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if the applicant applies for bail before the court concerned within three weeks from today, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. For a period of three weeks from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
October 16, 2025 Muk A482 No. 1490 of 2024 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench