HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6162 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Dayanand on behalf of respondent no.5 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1, 2 and 3 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private- respondents is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Revision Application No.0076 of 2023; Computerized Case No.202354041200000076 pending before the respondent No.2. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel has drawn the attention of the Court to the extract of the order-sheet and has pointed out that in majority of the dates, the proceedings before the respondent No.1 could not advance on account of the resolution passed by the Members of the Bar abstaining from judicial work. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending Revision Application No.0076 of 2023; Computerized Case No.202354041200000076 most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Ram Yadav, Monu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vimlesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the respondent No.2 shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 16, 2025 Harshita A227 No. 6162 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench