IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 625 of 2024 Date of Decision: 18.07.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Bhag Singh & Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Onkar Chand Sharma & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Ms. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 17.07.2025, issued under the signatures of Executive Engineer, Arki Division, HP PWD, Arki, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that Government of Himachal Pradesh, vide letter dated 17.07.2025, has conveyed its approval for complying with the judgment dated 13.05.2025 passed in CWP, subject to outcome of LPA. It has been stated in the aforesaid communication that draft 2 notification will be sent to the Government within five days for issuance of notification under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. However, in case the notification, as agreed to be issued within five days, is not issued within stipulated time, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken against the erring officials. Notice issued to the respondents are discharged. July 18, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge