RADHE SHYAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/10021/2025 · 2025-10-16
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202194 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202194 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10021 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Priyanka, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.K. Maurya, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Akber Ahmad, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3-Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Limited and perused the records.
2. By means of the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged the proceedings of recovery of Swrojgar loan instituted against him.
3. After advancing submissions at some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that she cannot assail the legality of recovery proceedings and she requested that facility of repayment of loan in easy instalments be granted to the petitioner and she stated that the petitioner can only manage to pay Rs.5,000/- per month towards repayment of loan amount.
4. Although, the learned counsel for the opposite parties have opposed the petition, but the learned counsel for the bank has stated that the bank is interested in recovery of loan amount and in case it is ensured that the loan amount is repaid without any coercive action the bank would have no objection.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by providing that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priyanka, Sheelu Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akber Ahmad Radhe Shyam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner will deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards repayment of loan within a period of seven days from today and thereafter he will deposit Rs.5,000/- by 7th day of each month with the the U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank towards repayment of loan amount. In case the petitioner continues to make deposits of the loan amount as aforesaid no coercive action shall be taken against him for recovery of the amount. The benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner in case he commits any default in payment of instalments. October 16, 2025 Ram.
WRIC No. 10021 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench