VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/1784/2025 · 2025-10-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202181 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 202181 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1784 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary counter affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.281 of 2024, under Section 80(2), 85 of BNS & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Mall, District Lucknow.
4. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that daughter of the informant was married to the applicant around two years ago and subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed her. Cause of death, as per the postmortem report, could not be ascertained, however, in the viscera report, poison was found.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that there is nothing on record to demonstrate that soon before her death the victim was subjected to any physical or mental harassment in relation to demand of dowry at the instance of the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 26.09.2024 and has no criminal antecedent, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : D.P. Dutt Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kunwar Manish Rakesh, Sunil Kumar Sinha Vipin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant Vipin Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 1784 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench