Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 202180 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8729/2025 · 2025-10-16

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8729 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Badrus Sahar, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- “.......... this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the the impugned charge sheet no. 543 of 2015 dated 10.11.2015 arising out of case crime No. 646 of 2015 under section 147/148/149/452/325/326/307/504/506 I.P.C. and section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, related to police station Thakurganj, District Lucknow as well as quashing the summoning order dated 21.11.2015 passed by learned Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate C.B.I. (A.P.) Lucknow contained in Annexure No.1 and 2 respectively to this petition, to secure the ends of justice.” 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No. 6 to the application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. October 16, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 8729 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench