NIYAZ AHMAD AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/3148/2025 · 2025-02-18
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20217 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20217 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:24463-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3148 of 2025 Petitioner :- Niyaz Ahmad And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M J Akhtar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 31.01.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0063 of 2025, under Sections 85, 80(2) B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P.Act, Police Station- Hata, District- Kushinagar (Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest or harass the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report."
3. After substantial arguments once the Court has declined for quashing the FIR, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. However, leave may be accorded to the petitioners to apply before the competent court for anticipatory bail/bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
7. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid leave. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 A.K.Srivastava Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad